The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the prosecutor’s appeal (unfair sentencing) is as follows: (a) the crime of this case committed by the defendant was committed by force after the victim, who was on the road, was unable to take the face of the victim by hand, and was committed by force; and (b) the nature of the crime is not good; and (c) the compensation for damage was not made; and (d) the sentence of the court below, which sentenced the suspension of execution 2 years; (b) the observation of protection; and (c) the order to attend the community service order for 120 hours and the order to attend the lecture for sexual assault treatment for 40 hours, is deemed unreasonable.

2. In full view of the facts alleged in the grounds of appeal, including the fact that the defendant was found guilty and the defendant was found guilty, the fact that there was no record of punishment either for the same kind of crime or for a fine exceeding the fine, and other circumstances of all the sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, degree of damage, and circumstances after the crime, the above assertion is without merit, since the court below's punishment is too unjustifiable and unreasonable.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.