logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.10.25 2013고합278
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 24, 1998, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a special larceny, etc. at the Incheon District Court on April 23, 2004; one year and six months in imprisonment with prison labor for a special larceny, etc. at the same court on September 30, 2005; one year and six months in the same court on April 13, 2007; eight months in the same court on April 13, 2007; one year and six months in the same court on July 9, 2008; and two years and six months in the same court on June 3, 2010; and the execution of the sentence was terminated on September 8, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On April 6, 2013, at around 22:45, the Defendant carried out a computer game with the Defendant’s type E in the “DPC bank” located in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, with the Defendant’s type E, and the Defendant was able to sit in the Defendant’s side page, and the Defendant sawd the victim F, who was a victim of the computer game, 120,000 won of cash 120,000 won of the victim’s possession, and one credit card 1,000,000 won of the market price.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property jointly with E.

2. On April 10, 2013, at around 07:20, the Defendant discovered that the Victim G was seated with the Defendant’s type E while leaving the aforementioned “DPC bank” together with the Defendant’s type E, and the Defendant reported the network, and Party E had a 44,000 won in cash, which is the victim’s possession on his/her own computer, and a wall with which the market price on credit card and driver’s license cannot be known.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property jointly with E.

As such, the Defendant stolen the victims' articles twice habitually.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. He shall be the E in the prosecutorial examination protocol against the defendant and the E in part of the suspect examination protocol (No. 60, No. 61 of the evidence list) of each prosecutorial office against the defendant.

arrow