The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the Defendant was employed by D Chairperson, and the victim E (the age of 28) from August 27, 2015 to November 27, 2015 as an employee in charge of administration of the foregoing D.

A. On September 2015, the Defendant followed the victim, who is going to the full hand, at the above D office located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon around 10:00, after cleaning, and going to the full hand, on September 1, 2015.

“In doing so, the victim was spared by both arms, and thereafter the victim was spared.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim under the protection and supervision of the defendant due to business or employment relationship.

B. From around 10:00 on September 21, 2015 to around 11:00, the Defendant: (a) when the victim was engaged in the work of linking the outer hacks to the body of a computer, the victim was seated behind the victim; (b) the USB sets in this body hacks opened the body and connected the outer hacks to the inner line; and (c) the victim hacked the victim with the hacks that the victim was unable to close the hacks well; and (d) hacks that the victim was hacked in knee.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim under the protection and supervision of the defendant due to business or employment relationship.

(c)

around September 23, 2015 to September 24, 2015, the Defendant had conversations related to the exhibitions supervised by the said D, and the Defendant left behind the victim, who was seated in the chair, had the victim’s shoulder covered by both arms, and the Defendant’s fingers down the victim’s chest.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim under the protection and supervision of the defendant due to business or employment relationship.

2. The burden of proving the facts charged in a judgment in a criminal trial is the prosecutor, and the conviction is true to the extent that the judge does not have any reasonable doubt.