1. The sentence against the accused shall be 1.5 million won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

[Fact-finding] The part of the criminal records and the background of the criminal facts charged by the Defendant is not included in the scope of prosecution. The Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Daegu District Court on November 27, 2014 due to the charge of forging private documents. The above judgment became final and conclusive on February 12, 2015.

On the other hand, the Defendant, as the representative of D Co., Ltd. in Namyang-si, was performing the sale of the land of “F in Namyang-si,” with E and “F in Namyang-si,” and on September 2010, the Defendant was unable to sell the relevant land to H who was sold a partitioned number G, and was in collusion with E to forge the sales contract under H’s name. On November 25, 2010, the Defendant, at the office of the above company, prepared on September 17, 2010 by H to E.

A. The following crimes have been committed by Defendant 1, on the above background, by changing the parcel number into “I”) to “I” and preparing a new trade contract, and “E” has forged one copy of the real estate transaction contract under H by preparing a modified transaction agreement with H’s name and affixing seals in the H’s name, which was prepared in advance to the H’s name (the Defendant was prosecuted for committing the crime of forgery, etc., and the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment as seen earlier).

[Criminal facts]

1. Forging a private document;

A. The Defendant, through J attorney-at-law, intended to proceed with a lawsuit seeking partition of the jointly owned property “F in Southyang-si,” intended to forge a sales contract and change the number of the parcel to H as seen in the facts. Accordingly, when it was necessary to “written consent to partition of land and jointly owned property,” the change of the number of the parcel was made, with the intention to forge the letter and power of attorney, such as division of jointly owned property under H’s name.

On October 12, 2011, the defendant is an attorney-at-law in the JJ Office in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, who knows that fact.