1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant 1,034,515,720 won and the defendant 1,034,515,720 won from August 14, 2008 to January 18, 2012.

1. Scope of the judgment of this court;

A. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant for damages amounting to KRW 3,18,493,602 and damages for delay. The court of first instance accepted 2,494,779,11 of the plaintiff's claim and 5% per annum from August 14, 2008 to June 18, 2009, and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment. The remaining claims were dismissed. 2) The plaintiff appealed against the judgment of the first instance. The plaintiff revised the purport of the claim as described in the above claim in the judgment of the first instance court before remand. The court of first instance accepted the defendant's appeal to KRW 3,746,459, 250 (the remainder of the claim shall be KRW 1,67,281, 278, 2781, 278, 278, 371, 278, 278, 2781, 375, 2781, 278.

3. Accordingly, both the Plaintiff and the Defendant appealed, and the Supreme Court attached the judgment before remanding out of the part against the Defendant prior to remand.

1. 3. The list of construction specifications by item of defects and the cost of repairing defects; 3. The list of the following pages is as follows: “The matters applied for additional appraisal (the quality, etc. resulting from the alteration of design).”

The part on the claim for damages relating to the claim for damages was reversed, and that part of the case was remanded.

B. According to the scope of adjudication, the scope of adjudication by this Court is limited to the claim reversed and remanded by the Supreme Court among the plaintiff's claims, and the judgment before the remainder is remanded was separately determined by the judgment of remand.

(e).