The plaintiffs' preliminary claims added by this court before remand are dismissed.

The plaintiffs' total cost of litigation.

1. After remanding the case, the Plaintiffs sought payment of indirect construction cost (449,05,277 won and delayed damages) due to the extension of the total construction period of the overall contract at the first instance court. The first instance court rejected the remainder of the claims by citing some of the Plaintiffs’ claims (404,149,749 won and delayed damages).

In this regard, only the defendant appealed against the defendant among the judgment of the first instance.

The Plaintiffs, prior to the remanding of the case, filed a claim for the payment of the indirect construction cost due to the extension of the construction period or the extension of the construction period of the contracts by the type of the fourth and fifth preliminary claims and the indirect construction cost due to the absences between the contracts by the type of the fourth and fifth instances. The court prior to the remanding of the case, revoked the part against the Defendant among the judgment of the first instance, dismissed all the Plaintiffs’ primary claims corresponding to the above cancellation, dismissed all the Plaintiffs’ primary claims, and dismissed the remainder of the conjunctive claims, respectively.

On the other hand, only the defendant appealed to the part against the defendant as to the conjunctive claim in the judgment of the court before the remanding.

The judgment of remand reversed the part against the Defendant regarding the conjunctive claim in the judgment of this court prior to remand, and remanded this part of the case to this court.

Ultimately, in the instant case, the primary claim that was not the subject of reversal was finalized at the same time with the pronouncement of the judgment of remanding the conjunctive claim, and thus, the subject of the trial by this court is limited to the conjunctive claim added by this court before the remanding.

2. The reasoning for this part of this Court is as follows, except for the dismissal or addition of the reasoning for this part is as follows, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the period in Paragraph 1 (including each quoted Form). Therefore, it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act as it is.

The third judgment of the court of first instance is conducted 13.