logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.07.10 2013고단2258 (1)
사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. B and C’s joint criminal acts are actual business owners of “E” in the name of “E” located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D 201, and C receives KRW 2.50,000 per day from B in the above game room. In addition, C received cash from customers in the game room, it was decided to pay a card with the corresponding points and exchange money equivalent to the points obtained by customers. In particular, when the game room is controlled, it is so-called “bab president” to make a false statement to an investigative agency as a business owner for the purpose of criminal punishment on behalf of the actual business owner.

B around November 27, 2012, around 18:00, a computer with a card 29 units installed at the above location, and a “sea-going machine” which is a speculative machine was installed.

If a customer pays cash to the calculation unit located in the game room, the game machine is commenced by the card with which the corresponding points are given by the employee, and if the opening server is short of the opening opening, the electronic image of the game machine is cut up by the rate determined in advance according to the results of continuous distribution of the same picture or number, and the score obtained by the customer is accumulated in the card connected to the game machine and kept.

After that, B and C offered an unspecified number of customers to use the game machine in the above game room from the above date to the end of 19:15 of the same month. C paid a card filled in the game room for the above period, and C operated a business by means of exchange commission, such as collecting 10% of the amount of money, in cash exchange for the accumulated points on the cards of customers.

As a result, B and C conspired to engage in speculative activities.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. by Defendant A from November 27, 2017 to 05:00 of the same month.

arrow