The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

In light of the fact that the defendant has both the criminal acts of this case and has a deep and deep reflective intention, it is difficult to see that there is a conclusive intention on the storage of stolens, that act according to F's direction and did not focus on the degree of participation in the criminal acts of this case, that there was no criminal proceeds acquired by the defendant, and that the defendant paid 10 million won to the victim company of the embezzlement crime of embezzlement and agreed to pay 10 million won, punishment (ten months of imprisonment) sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below was rendered on December 14, 201 and sentenced to imprisonment of two years and six months for fraud, etc. and completed a repeated crime on July 2, 2013, and committed each of the instant crimes from the time when the sentence was terminated and three months elapsed since the end of the sentence, and the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes at different times. The instant embezzlement and special theft crime was committed by disposing of leased vehicles on a large lane and by using GPS and auxiliary key installed in the instant vehicle in advance, and then cutting them again, in view of the content and method of the relevant crime. The lower court determined the sentence, considering the fact that the Defendant committed the crime, and there was no same criminal history, and there was no smooth agreement between the victim of the crime of embezzlement, and the lower court did not present at an appellate court to change the sentence in favor of the Defendant, and the Defendant’s allegation that the Defendant’s punishment was unfair even if all of the circumstances indicated in the record and arguments were considered as inappropriate.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.