Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a press-based cargo vehicle.

On March 4, 2013, at around 13:50, the Defendant moved the front road of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Civil Sports Center located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul to a speed of about 10 to 20km at a speed of about 10 to 20km from the new wind basin to the eth of the sexual traffic.

At that time, the location is a place where a crosswalk is installed, and if a person engaged in driving service complies with the crosswalk signal and is green light in the crosswalk, the vehicle is stopped and the following red light is cut off, the pedestrian has a duty of care to drive the vehicle again.

However, the defendant neglected to do so and found that green light has been cut off on the crosswalk, and the victim D (the age of 40) who entered the crosswalk due to the occupational negligence that proceeded with the above cargo vehicle is shocked to the right side of the above cargo vehicle, and followed by the victim's left side with the front right side of the above cargo vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant caused the above victim by the above occupational negligence, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as the first part of the satisfaction of the left-hand side in need of approximately 12 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1) (i.e., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Jan. 1, 2