logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.12.23 2014가단40158
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

(b) As from July 1, 2014, 2,360,200 and as above.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. A. Around June 3, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant for the lease term of the buildings indicated in the attached list with the Defendant from June 25, 2009 to June 24, 2009, for the lease deposit of KRW 15,000, for the lease deposit of KRW 100,000, for the rent of KRW 700,000 each month from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010, and for the lease of KRW 750,000 each month from July 1, 2010, and thereafter delivered the above building to the Defendant at that time.

B. Since then, the above lease was implicitly renewed on June 25, 201 and June 25, 2013.

C. However, from September 2012 to June 30, 2012, the Defendant did not pay a total of KRW 2,360,200 as of June 30, 2014.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s service of the duplicate of the instant complaint terminated the above lease contract which was implicitly renewed as above. As such, the Plaintiff sought against the Defendant the payment of unjust enrichment amounting to KRW 2,360,200 in total and KRW 750,000 in monthly from July 1, 2014 to the completion date of delivery of the said building.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow