beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.
The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator, or provide such services for communications of a third party.
1. On November 30, 2016, Defendant B had F take the “identification card” and “written signature of the fact of identification” of Defendant B’s crime, and sent this to G via F, Defendant B, including through the opening of the Defendant’s pre-paid wire depth (H) in the name of the Defendant, provided ten pre-paid phones as shown in the attached Table (B’s crime sight table) for the purpose of telecommunication.
2. On November 30, 2016, Defendant C had F take the “identification card” and “written signature of the fact of identification” of Defendant C’s crime, and sent this to G via F, Defendant C provided ten prepaid phones as shown in the attached Form [C’s Crime List], including through F, for the purpose of telecommunication by opening a total of 10 prepaid phones as shown in the attached Form (C).
3 On November 28, 2016, Defendant E had F take the “identification card” and “written signature of the fact of identification” of Defendant E, Defendant E, and offered 10 pre-paid phones as shown in the attached Form (E’s crime sight table), including through F, a total of 10 pre-paid phones as shown in the attached Form (E) by means of sending them to G via F.
4. On December 7, 2016, Defendant A committed the crime of Defendant A: (a) met F on a non-regular basis; (b) prepared an application for opening of the pre-paid phone at an irregular agency located in the sub-agency of the viewing room; and (c) opened the pre-paid phone, via F, sent it to G via the phone, and (d) opened the pre-paid phone depth (K) in the name of the Defendant; and (b) provided it for another person’s communications as shown in the attached Form (A’s crime inundation).
5. Defendant D’s criminal act committed by Defendant D refers to the “identification” of Defendant D with F on December 7, 2016.