Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:50 on March 14, 2015, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “this son, this son, franchis, franchis, franchis, fran, franchis, fran, franchis, fran, franchis, this frans, franchis, franchis, and franchis, franchis, franchis, franchis, franchis, frans, franchis, franchis, and franchis the victim’s body, franchis, fin, and franchis the victim’s body, and fins the victim’s body to the wall of the victim.” However, the victim reported to the police.

2. At around 02:30 on March 14, 2015, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) sounded the police assigned for special guard in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, in F District; (b) G, a police official belonging to the said police station that dealt with the assault case under paragraph (1); and (c) G, who is a police official belonging to the said police station that dealt with the assault case under paragraph (1), for the purpose of preventing this, G, who was fluencing the Defendant’s body by blockinging the front of the said G, flucing him, and flucing him at one time, and flucing him with G’s body “A sound and flucing him at his hand.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the handling of assault cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and G

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and the choice of fines) concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is to prevent violence that causes taxi drivers by hearing and interesting a serious desire for sentencing.