1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance following the expansion of the purport of the claim in the plaintiff's trial is as follows.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts are the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Judgment on the parties' arguments

A. In mediating a lease contract for a part of a multi-family house, a broker who has a liability for damages provides the lessee with data on the relationship of rights of the multi-family house necessary to determine whether the lessee is able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to secure and explain the relationship of rights, etc. of the object of brokerage indicated on the real estate registration injury. Therefore, the lessee is not obligated to enter the details of the lease deposit, lease time and termination period, etc. in the description of the object of brokerage in the above form prescribed by the Enforcement Rule of the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act, if the lessee fails to comply with a request for data on the lease deposit, time and termination period, etc. of lease.

In addition, it is sufficiently notified that there is a risk that all or part of the deposit may not be recovered due to complex legal relationship of the right to collateral security and multi-family house, and advise the lessee to carefully determine whether to enter into the instant lease agreement, the amount of the deposit and rent, methods of payment, etc., and to minimize such risk.