logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.11.10 2015고정715
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 06:30 on March 24, 2015, the Defendant found the 1studio 301 room where the husband D (50 years of age) was living in Ansan-si, and her husband D (50 years of age) was living in the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, and she took a bath to the victim E (0 years of age 42) who was living in the Dong-gu, and she was able to take a buck by her hand and tightly tightly, she skes the head debt, and walked the buckbuck, and she assaulted the victim E (0 years of age 42), thereby requiring treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Entry of the defendant's partial statement and E in the police interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The following circumstances acknowledged by the head of the complaint, the death diagnosis report and the body parts of the victim, the notification of reasons for non-prosecution, the written decision of provisional disposition 2015Kahap39 (Support in child delivery), and the written decision of provisional disposition 3 photographs as follows: (i) the victim's statement as to the circumstances in which the victim was injured by the defendant's assault was replaced; (ii) the victim was issued a written diagnosis of injury on the day of the instant case and immediately submitted the written diagnosis of injury to the police; (iii) the victim was found from the photographs taken by the police around 11:00 on the day of the instant case and the day of the instant case that the victim was exposed to external shock; (iv) the victim's name stated in the victim's injury diagnosis report issued before the victim filed the complaint corresponds to the facts charged; and (v) the defendant, who did not want to have a divorce, could have opened a new wall together with her husband, on the other hand, it is not easy to see that the victim was able to immediately have operated the victim's on the day.

arrow