logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.12.04 2020고단3251
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 13:30 on January 23, 2020, the Defendant: (a) stated the victim C ( South Korea, 87 years of age) who is not good in a usual sense as “snickness outside flut”, and (b) caused the victim’s face at least six weeks of her face to be taken six times in his/her hand.

Summary of Evidence

Witness

D In the case of testimony evidence of a victim who died in the part C of the protocol of interrogation of testimony of the court testimony (the second, the second, and the second) of D, the investigative agency conducted a cross-examination with the defendant. Since the defense counsel does not wish to take the procedure of testimony of the investigator separately in this court, it shall be deemed that the special circumstance is recognized in accordance with Article 314 of the Criminal Procedure Act and adopted as evidence.

1. Statement of police statement concerning C and D;

1. The victim's photograph, the victim's diagnosis report, and the defense counsel asserted to the effect that there was no fact at the time of the victim. However, the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, the content of the victim's statement of consistent damage at the investigative agency, i.e., the victim's statement of injury, and the content of the victim's statement of injury, i.e., the victim's statement of injury, i., the victim's statement of injury, i.e., the victim's statement of injury, the victim's himself/herself cannot be deemed to have been made when considering the victim's bodily injury photographs, and the fact that the victim was unable to have spathd and spathed, considering the victim's age and health condition, it is difficult to see that the victim was extremely deteriorated compared to the defendant, and that the victim was dead at the time when six

In full view of the victim’s photograph taken on the day of the instant case and the circumstances following the instant case known to the victim, the Defendant.

arrow