A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for and on January 21, 2016 at the Seoul Northern District Court for fraud, etc. and was sentenced to one year and six months for the same year.

7. 18. The sentence became final and conclusive.

[2] On July 201, 201, the Defendant is aware that the victim C acquired 200 million won of the deposit money related to the right to manage the credit from E and would receive the deposit money from E from the victim.

The purpose of this article was to acquire money by fraud.

1. The Defendant’s defraudation of KRW 40 million with the victim at the G real estate office operated by the Defendant in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, on May 2012, 2012.

It shall receive KRW 200,000,000,000,000 from E, for which the payment has not been returned.

To lend KRW 40 million to 30 million, only three months shall be used and repaid together with the money returned from E.

The term "highly false statements" were made.

However, the defendant did not have any experience in debt collection business, and there was no intention or ability to return 200 million won from E within three months on behalf of the victim, and there was no intention or ability to pay the amount received from the victim to the victim three months later.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; and (b) received a delivery of KRW 40 million on or around the 30th of the same month from the injured party.

2. On June 2012, the Defendant, by defraudation of KRW 30 million, was the victim’s phone at the above G G real estate office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Police Officer on the first day of June 2012, and, in order to receive a refund of KRW 200 million from E within three months, the Defendant made a false statement as to the need to add KRW 30 million to E.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any experience in the collection of claims, and on behalf of the victim, did not have the intention or ability to return the deposit amount of KRW 200 million from E within three months, and the deposit amount necessary for seizure was limited to KRW 5 million, and most of the money received from the victim.