logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.30 2016고단7328
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 20, 2017.

On April 18, 2014, the Defendant paid the victim C with interest of 3% per month if he/she lends 50 million won to the victim at the mutual French coffee shop located in the Geumdong-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-nam-si, Sung-gu, Sung-nam-si. The Defendant will change without any mold within three months.

The Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul apartment that has been sold in the name of the head of the Gu will be offered as a collateral of 1009 Dong 2201.

The purchase and sale of the apartment can dispose of the above collateral and repay the borrowed money without the mold at the remaining point, and if the collateral is not disposed of, the ownership of the apartment will be transferred.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any specific income, such as delinquency in monthly rent and management expenses, due to the fact that the economic situation has deteriorated extremely under the bad credit condition and the operation of the EF Game was not well performed at the time of Sungnam, which was operated at that time. An apartment that was offered as security had been residing in a tenant with a maximum amount of KRW 320 million,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 was invested in G, etc. as security, and it did not have any intent or ability to repay the amount even if it was borrowed from the damaged person, because it did not pay the expenses for registration to the Housing Association.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 40 million won from the victim to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the defendant's former domicile H on the same day, and 10 million won to the I Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of the defendant, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C. witness, I.D.

arrow