logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.11.07 2017나568
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: "The E's signature stated in the statement of settlement submitted by the evidence No. 1 does not add a mark of the qualification of the representative of the defendant to the E's signature stated in the statement of settlement submitted by the evidence No. 1, and if the above statement of settlement is added to the defendant's passage of arguments filed by the defendant in this lawsuit, the above statement of settlement is recognized that E, the representative of the defendant, was made on behalf of the defendant)," and the defendant No. 6 and No. 7 of the above Type No. 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: "The defendant and the defendant" stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where "the defendant and the defendant" are as "the representative of the defendant's E", and "from the defendant," respectively, are as stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of the principal lawsuit shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims of the principal lawsuit and the defendant's counterclaim shall be dismissed as they are without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow