logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.11.09 2018고정1843
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has not registered the motor vehicle management business to the head of the Si/Gun/Gu.

The defendant and C have the amount to be additionally accepted after preparing a contract by inducing customers, showing a serious challenge, and selling it to a false advertisement through a standardized term "marcing" as a sign-type corporation.

After the end, it is a way to purchase another used vehicle at a low price, and it is also meaningful to acquire the sales price of the used vehicle.

On April 28, 2017, at around 10:00, the Defendant and C met the Victim F, which had been located, to purchase the E-tested Car projected Vehicle, the “fit” in the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, in order to purchase the vehicle to nine million won.

Recognizing that “A written contract shall be drawn up with the victim.”

However, the above car was actually sold to the borrower about 42.6 million won, and the goods could not be sold to the borrower about 9 million won, the defendant and C had the additional burden to the victim, and the cancellation of the contract was planned.

The Defendant and C would be treated with the payment of an amount equivalent to 7.5 million won when disposing of G rocketing vehicles brought to the victim by delivering them to our side (the Defendants).

“First of all, the victim took over G rocketing vehicles owned by the victim from the victim.”

As above, the Defendant and C should have priority over other vehicles, and the Defendant and C should pay 32 million won in total between six months and four years in total as follows: “The foregoing vehicle is a glick vehicle entering the station by the reverse import, and there are 32 million won in addition to the capital to be additionally taken over.”

“Falsely speaking, it is absolutely impossible for the victim to obtain cancellation of the contract from the person suffering from the disturbance, and the victim’s “the day on which the said rocketing vehicle was absent from the lending of the said vehicle” for six months.

arrow