beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
And C, as business employees of D, corporation, which is a company soliciting subscribers to telecommunications services, could gain profits according to the opening records of mobile communications.
Accordingly, the defendant and C conspired to open only one smartphone without the consent of E using a copy of the resident registration certificate secured at the time of joining the previous smartphone in the name of E.
1. On July 27, 2012, the Defendant and C conspired to forge private documents, and the Defendant provided copies of the respective resident registration certificates of E and H, and H copies of the passbook in G located in Tong-si F on July 27, 2012, and C signed at will on the applicant’s signature column, stating that “E (personal information) is subscribed to the KT Twit Twit Telecommunication Communications Services and the amount of its use is transferred from the H’s agricultural bank account” on July 27, 2012.
As a result, the Defendant and C forged a “soleh new application” in the name of E, a private document relating to rights and obligations without authority for the purpose of exercising their rights and obligations in collusion.
2. The Defendant and C conspired to forge private document, as above, submitted one copy of the forged “Maleh New Application” to D staff Co., Ltd., Ltd. at the same time and place as set forth in Paragraph 1, as in Paragraph 1.
As a result, the Defendant and C used the forged private document “soleh Moble new application”.
3. The Defendant and C conspired as above, in collusion, filed an application for the opening of smartphone (I) by transmitting a copy of each resident registration certificate of E, E, and H, and a copy of H’s passbook via D’s business office, as set forth in paragraph (2), at the same time, place, and as set forth in paragraph (2).
However, in fact, the above application was forged and E did not have any intention to use the above smartphone.
Nevertheless, the defendant and C deceiving the victim as above.