logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.07.28 2014고단4842
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On December 17, 2003, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul District Court for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties; on March 21, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Busan District Court for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties; on September 5, 2006, the same court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties; on December 28, 2010, the same court was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence for one year for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (retaliatory Crime, etc.); on May 19, 2011, on March 9, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc.; on March 17, 2012, the judgment was revoked, and the execution of each of the above sentence was terminated from Busan Prison on December 2, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

On May 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the Revised Public Security Center located in the Busan Dong-dong, 248, the Busan Dong-gu, Busan Dong-dong, 21:40, the Defendant: (b) took a bath to the above D, such as “hosing” and “finsing” on one occasion, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crime and the maintenance of order of D’s public order, by taking the bath that D’s chills belonging to the Busan Dong-gu, Busan Dong-dong, the chill of the Busan Dong-gu, the Do-dong, obstructed the road and faced the disturbance, and obstructed the Defendant’s exercise of duties by taking advantage of his desire to return home to the above D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (Attachment of the current status of personal identification and confinement, and confirmation of the expiration of the term of

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act, among repeated crimes, the Defendant again commits the instant crime during the period of repeated crimes of the same kind.

arrow