A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months with prison labor at the Busan District Court for the obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. on August 22, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Busan Detention House on August 22, 2012. On February 18, 2013, the same court was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for assault, etc. on June 26, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence at the same detention center on June 26, 2014. On March 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for assault, etc. at

3. 19. The same detention house has terminated the enforcement of the sentence.

In addition, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for an injury, etc. at the same court on June 10, 2008; on March 27, 2009, the same court was sentenced to one year and six months for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; on October 14, 2009, a fine of four million won is imposed for the same court on March 23, 201; on the same court on March 23, 201, a fine of one million won is imposed for an assault; on the same court on April 10, 2013; on the same court on April 9, 2013, a fine of two million won is imposed for an assault; on the same court on April 9, 2013; and on the same court on June 18, 2014, a person who was issued a summary order of two million won for an assault, etc. at the same court on June 20, 2014, respectively.

The defendant is a fluorial bomb who assaults or threatens the business owners of the small-scale commercial building in Busan Metropolitan City, thereby harming the drinking value, etc.

1. On April 25, 2015, the Defendant, at around 22:30 on April 25, 2015, sent a report of 112 at the main point of “D” located in Busan B, and confirmed the details of the report against “D,” and sent it to G (45 years of age) who is a police officer belonging to the Busan National Police Station, the Busan National Police Agency, which confirmed the details of the report against “W, W. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am.).

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

2. A violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. against Victims H and I (Habitual conflict).