logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.07.24 2014누63840
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance and the amendment in this case are corrected as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition as follows. As such, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article

From the third side of the judgment of the first instance, 3 and 4 shall be corrected "12:0 to the first half" as "12:00 to the first half."

6. To correct the opinion that “not recognized” is “non-recognized” as “non-recognized.” 2. The additional decision of this Court (the Plaintiff’s assertion) by this Court constitutes occupational accidents as it was deceased due to occupational excessive or stress.

[Judgment] The above assertion made by the plaintiff in this court is no different from the plaintiff's already asserted in the first instance court. The first instance court's rejection of the plaintiff's assertion is justifiable on the grounds that the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the evidence additionally submitted in this court (the testimony of the witness F and the result of this court's entrustment of examination of medical records for the head of the same-sex hospital in this court) cannot be deemed to have been excessive from the construction works of the apartment complex in the marina District where B had engaged in the work at the time of death. The second instance's rejection of the plaintiff's assertion is justifiable, since there is a high possibility that the existing disease aggravated due to the aggravation of administration for the

3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim based on the conclusion, is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing plaintiff.

arrow