1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiffs against the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, with the exception of the following dismissal or addition, and the additional determination.

It shall be quoted pursuant to Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part that is removed or added is the second 15th day of the second 15th day to the Plaintiff A Company.

The evidence Nos. 10, 11, and 4 of the first sentence shall be added to “A, 12, 13, and 22,” and the second sentence shall be added to “A, 12, 13, and 22,” and the second sentence shall be added to “A,” respectively.

The amount shall be added next to the 5th "amount".

The term "the contract for construction works" that will be the fifth seventh place is "the bottom of the right-hand side, not the person awarding the contract for construction works."

Defendant D, E, F, and G, the representative of the owners of underground first floor, third floor, and third floor, are “Defendant D, the representative of the owners of underground first floor, the first floor, and third floor,” and “Defendant E, F, G, and the owner of underground second floor, the representative of each sectional owner of underground first floor, the first floor, and the third floor above the ground.”

Following the fifth nineth century, the phrase “no evidence exists” is added to the phrase “(the M signature, other than the Defendant’s management body, appears to be the representative of the five-story sectional owners on the ground following the signature of the other Defendants.”

Section 2 '2 from the fifth to the 12th

B. The part of the “judgment” shall be written as follows: (B) Determination (the claim for damages due to the improper cancellation of a contract) may be freely determined as to what kind of contract is to be concluded in accordance with the principle of freedom of contract.

However, if one party would incur damage by refusing to conclude a contract without a reasonable reason even if one party acted in accordance with trust even though one party would have concluded a contract clearly at the negotiation stage, it is an illegal act that goes beyond the bounds of the freedom of contract in light of the principle of trust and good faith.