1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, the pertinent part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance that “the developments leading up to the disposition,” “the Plaintiff’s assertion,” “related Acts and subordinate statutes,” and “recognition facts,” are the same as that of the pertinent part (from the second fifth to 8th, up to 9th and up to 23th).

Following the 2nd "Additional Tax 269,920 won", "Additional Tax 269,920 won" (attached Form 2, 313, 149,700 won for Additional Tax 149,70 won for Additional Tax 302, 402, additional Tax 120 won for Additional Tax 120,220 won for the relevant Nos. 402, and

The part of the “(7)” from the 6th to the 10th 10th shall be as follows:

【 (7) 원고는 사내판매한 대상나프타 공급물량을 산정할 때 접촉개질부산물 생성에 소요된 나프타 물량을 차감하였다. 이와 같이 ‘차감한 나프타 물량(ⓖ)’에 ‘부산물을 공제하고 산출한 자율소요량(ⓓ)’을 곱한 경우의 할당관세 대상 원유량은 별지 3 ‘과소추천물량’(이는 제1심 판결 별지 과소추천물량을 통합하여 정리한 것이다

) 표 ⓗ항 기재와 같다. 】 23쪽 이하의 “관계법령”에 이 판결 별지 4 “관계법령”의 내용을 추가한다.

2. Determination

A. Of the reasons stated in this part, “(1) customs refund, self-required amount, deduction by-products, (2) quota, relevant provisions, and procedures for the application of quota tariff” are as follows: (8) the relevant part of the reasoning of the first instance judgment (from the 7th to the 12th 10th eth eth eth son).

9 The term "1976" that reduces "1976" to "1974".

9 The phrase, “Law No. 10424, Dec. 30, 2010,” which is the first tenth (10. 14. 7. 201) shall be read as “Law No. 10817, Jul. 14, 2011.”

9 The term "public notice of required amount" that will be seventh below shall be determined and made.