logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.01 2016가단1782
설계용역비
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 145,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from December 25, 2015 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. Around December 2013, the Plaintiff and D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) (a certified architect who operates the architectural firm in the name of “C” (hereinafter “E”) entered into a design service contract for the construction of urban-type residential housing (a complex type) and neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter “instant multi-family housing”) at KRW 400,00,00 (excluding value-added tax) with the Plaintiff and D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) on the ground that the contract amount for the design service contract for the construction of urban-type residential housing (a complex type) and neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter “instant multi-family housing”).

(2) Between the Plaintiff on the same day and the Plaintiff entered into a contract by modifying some provisions based on the standard design contract (No. 2009-1092, Nov. 23, 2009, published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs No. 2009-1092, hereinafter “standard contract”).

(3) At the time of the conclusion of each of the above contracts, the construction of the instant multi-family housing was scheduled to consist of four parts, namely, Adong “G”, B “H”, and Cdong “I” and Ddong “J”, which constitute multi-family housing.

(4) However, around March 2014, the Plaintiff agreed to perform design services for Adong and B according to the agreement with E, and to not proceed with design for Cdong and Ddong.

Accordingly, the pre-existing design service cost of KRW 60,000 shall be reduced to KRW 60,000,000, and the date of the contract shall be retroactive to the date of conclusion of each of the above contracts, and the contracting party shall conclude a contract again by setting the construction cost at the time of the modification of the contract. As to the design service of “G” of “A”, K and E shall be entrusted to the Plaintiff and shall be paid KRW 170,00,000 as the cost of the design service, and as to the design service of “H” of the B Dong, L shall be entrusted to the Plaintiff and shall be paid KRW 170,000,000 as the cost of the design service performance, and each contract was concluded by modifying

Of the above contracts, the Plaintiff and L.

arrow