1. The part against the plaintiffs of the money that orders payment under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

2...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. On September 27, 2010, Defendant Dae-gu Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Dae-gu Construction”) subcontracted the soundproof walls construction from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, which was ordered from September 27, 2010, to the construction period from September 27, 2010 to January 19, 2012 (which was extended from September 27, 2010 to April 30, 2013).

B. On October 4, 2012, Defendant Gyeong-Gyeong Construction reported the implementation plan for road construction to the district unit in the jurisdiction of the highway between Tong Young-gu and Daejeon as follows:

The name of a construction project: The construction project site for the installation of soundproof walls from the 52km to the 54km of a highway between 52km and Daejeon: The two direction-setting period from October 8, 2012 to December 31, 2012 (09:0-18:00, 09:0-17:00): two traffic guidance signs, four traffic guidance signs, 100 safety fences, 100 air conditioners (time at night), three light lights (time at night), three signal lights (time at night), three signal lights.

C. On October 17, 2012, Defendant Gyeong-Gyeong Construction submitted a daily traffic blocking plan to block one lane from the point from 52.5km to 55 km to the highway patrol zone in charge of soundproof walls construction and the highway patrol zone at the site of soundproof walls construction. D.

E, around 17:49 on October 17, 2012, while driving the Plaintiff-owned F-type passenger car (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned vehicle”) and driving a two-lane road at the location of 54 km from the 54km in the west-gu, Seog-gu, Seogdong-gu, Seogdong-gu, Seogdong-gu, Seogdong-gu, Seoul, the construction of soundproof walls was completed, and died by shocking any G during the process of recovering safety facilities such as Rabcon, etc., and immediately shocking the right side part of Hpoter owned by Defendant D (hereinafter “Defendant-owned vehicle”), which is a construction vehicle operated by K in the front bank, and shocking the front side part of the Hpoter owned by the Plaintiff-owned vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). As a result, E died.

(hereinafter referred to as “the network E”). E.