A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On November 17, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to two years in Seoul Central District Court to imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), and the above judgment was finalized on February 4, 2010.

[2013 Highest 138]

1. Forgery of securities;

A. On February 19, 2009, for the purpose of utteringing securities, the Defendant: (a) around February 19, 2009, in the D office in the operation of the Defendant in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the amount of money in the face-to-face page with a tampial tample is marked as “Seoul Jongno-gu D, A, and joint and several sureties” in the column of the issuer column; and (b) marks E’s seal affixed in advance to E’s name.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the description on the rights and obligations of securities for the purpose of exercising them.

B. On August 4, 2009, the Defendant: (a) around August 4, 2009, for the purpose of uttering of securities forgery, indicated the amount column using a tampial in the promissory note paper in the foregoing D office as “Seoul Jongno-gu Cra, A, Dong and E” in the issuer column; and (b) stamped the seal of E in advance attached to the E’s name.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a promissory note in the name of E, a securities, for the purpose of exercising.

2. Counterfeitd securities events;

A. A around February 19, 2009, the Defendant for the exercise of forged securities at the office of the Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul around February 19, 2009, offered that G is not aware of the forgery as security for the existing obligation.

As stated in paragraph (1), a copy of a counterfeited promissory note was used as if it were actually prepared.

B. On August 4, 2009, around August 4, 2009, the Defendant at the office of the said FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFG as security for existing obligations.

As stated in paragraph (1), a copy of a counterfeited promissory note was used as if it were actually prepared.

3. Forgery of private documents;

A. On February 19, 2009, the Defendant, who forged private documents, around February 19, 2009, shall be entitled to exercise the following: (a) around February 19, 2009.