1. The sentence shall be suspended against the defendant;

2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the violation of the Road Traffic Act.

Punishment of the crime

On May 6, 2012, around 21:38, the Defendant operated a three-wheeled vehicle owned by the Defendant, which was not covered by mandatory insurance from the Doluco street to the Doluco market along a two-lane road in front of the Dolutolutolutolutoluene, Nowon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning motor vehicle mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and the main sentence of Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion concerning the rejection of prosecution under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (including fine of 300,000,000 won per day: 50,000 won per year: The prosecution shall be dismissed in consideration of initial crimes, reflectivity, the Defendant’s health conditions, etc.);

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving a C-wheeled Motor Vehicle.

On May 6, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 21:38, the two-lane of the two-lane in front of the Dolutolutolutoluth of the original city, along the speed from the Doluco distance to the Doluco market, was driven at about 60 km per hour.

At the time, there is an intersection in which signal lights are installed at night and at the front of that place, so the driver had a duty of care to live well on the right and the right of the front and the right of the front and the right and to proceed in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, even if the Defendant neglected to do so and reported that the signal, etc. is changed to red signal, the Defendant entered the intersection as it is, and received the front part of the two-wheeled vehicle operated by the victim D (the age of 53) who is directly engaged in under the new name in the direction of the direction of the Defendant’s moving from the two-lane right side of the direction of the Defendant’s moving.

As a result, the Defendant damaged the above car by occupational negligence to the extent of KRW 2,191,211, such as the replacement and maintenance of the front-standing car.

2. This part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act.