logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.05.23 2012고정2268
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant from around August 4, 201 to the same month.

5. From 15:00 to 15:00, the victim C’s “D” bank operated by Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk-gu Seoul, the fact was committed as if the victim had no intent or ability to pay the amount of using the scam, and it was committed as if the victim would pay the amount of using the scam, and it did not pay 15,600 won of the amount of using the scam and did not pay it.

2. On September 13, 201, the Defendant: (a) from around 18:12 to around 23:00 of the same month, from around September 13, 2011 to around 23:00 of the same month, the victim F in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City was engaged in the act as if the victim would pay the price of using the scam, etc. despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price of using the scam, etc.; and (b) provided the scam with the designation of the scam and used by the scam

3. On September 19, 201, from around 12:41 to 06:30 of the same month, the Defendant obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of money by failing to pay the amount of money used, even though he/she did not have any intent or ability to pay the amount of money used for the scam, as if he/she would pay the amount to the victim, and by failing to pay the amount of money used for the scam 17,900 won after being designated by the victim.

4. The Defendant: (a) from around 10:00 on September 20, 201 to around 07:30 on September 21, 201, the “MPC” managed by the Victim L located in K in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City from around 10:0 to around 07:30 on the same month; (b) was committed as if the Defendant would pay the cream usage price to the victim despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the cream usage price; and (c) was committed as if the Defendant would have paid the cream usage price to the victim; and

5. The defendant.

arrow