1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 2012, the Defendant concluded the instant construction contract or the instant construction contract (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction contract”) with G operating F via G via G, the mother of the mother, and E, the three-story neighborhood living facilities on the ground of D major 544mm2, each 544m2, each of which is the “three-story neighborhood living facilities” (hereinafter referred to as “instant building construction contract”).

B. Around May 2012, the Defendant purchased industrial accident insurance and employment insurance with respect to the instant construction project, and reported the construction amount to the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service via G to KRW 309,405,000.

The above KRW 309,405,00 was calculated in accordance with the Regulations on the Method of Calculation of total construction cost for construction works executed by a person who is not the Ministry of Employment and Labor (the standard unit price per unit area x 630,000 square meters x the total floor area 491.12 square meters).

C. Meanwhile, upon the Defendant’s request, G drafted a standard contract form for construction works on fake 723,436,000 won in order for the Defendant to obtain a loan for small and medium enterprise facilities worth KRW 300,000 from an enterprise bank, and the corporate bank extended the amount of KRW 29,925,00 (= KRW 126,925,000 in KRW 13,000 in KRW 133,00,000 in KRW 40,000 in terms of the contract amount according to the nature and nature of the survey.

G around October 2012, following the completion of the instant construction, the Defendant completed the preservation registration of the instant building on October 10, 2012.

E. The Defendant paid G KRW 404,725,00 for the instant construction cost. At the Defendant’s request, G returned KRW 96,80,000 out of the said amount to the Defendant, and the specific details are as follows.

On the other hand, on May 15, 2012, the Defendant directly paid KRW 10,000,000 to the actual construction business operator I related to the instant construction project.

the amount to be returned to the Defendant is the total sum of the amounts to be returned by the Defendant, from May 4, 2012 to

6. 4. 96,80,000: 126,925,000 223,725,000 on June 8, 2012; 24,000,000 on June 9, 2012; 19,725,000 on June 11, 2012; 163,725,000 on June 18, 2012; 163,725,000 on June 18, 200; 181,725,000 on June 18, 200; 18,80,000 on June 18, 200; 18,80,000; 1625,000 on June 18, 200;