A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 889]

1. On January 2014, 201, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant borrowed an additional amount of KRW 30 million to provide security by changing the deposit money to KRW 100 million on the existing deposit money for lease on a deposit basis which caused KRW 50 million from the Busan Southern-ro, Suwon-gu, Busan-ro 266, and received instructions from C to take procedures for registration of change of deposit on a deposit basis at the office of a certified judicial scrivener who is the customer of the victim.”

Since then, the Defendant presented to the lessor’s agent E a letter of delegation on the registration of change of right to lease on deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit money with F of the said certified judicial scrivener’s office’s employees, and stated that it is necessary documents to register the person on deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit money, and E had E affix his seal on the name

On January 21, 2014, the Defendant re-entered to the Saemaul Treasury of the above Yongju to register the change of the right to lease on a deposit basis in a normal condition, and prepared the documents of the lease on a deposit basis as if he/she were to register the change of the right to lease on a deposit basis, and received 30 million won from the injured party to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the Defendant as additional loans.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not obtain consent from the lessor to obtain a loan by changing the lease of a right to lease on a deposit basis from KRW 50 million to KRW 100 million, and there was a debt of KRW 20 million at the time, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party due to the absence of any particular revenue or property, he did not have the intent or ability to provide the victim with a right to lease on a deposit basis as security.

Nevertheless, the defendant's above statements are false to the victim, and they belong thereto.