Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 4,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On January 26, 2017, Defendant A’s assaulted the victim E (18 years of age) and the Defendant on the ground that the movement of the victim E (18 years of age) and the Defendant 1 took place in front of Japan-dong C3’s drinking house, Japan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu around the victim’s bomb, and boomed the victim’s bomb with her hand, and her her flad the victim’s fage, and her her flad with the victim’s her her fage, and her her flad with the victim’s 18 years of age.
2. The Defendants who interfered with the performance of official duties by Defendant A and Defendant B were to obtain confirmation on their personal information from K, a police officer belonging to the JJ police station of the Jungsan-dong Police Station of the Busan-dong Police Station called out after receiving a report of the above assault case on the roads in front of Dongsan-dong, Busan-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-do, and upon receiving a report of the above assault case.
During that process, Defendant A refused to disclose his personal information, expressed his desire to the victims, and expressed his attitude to continue assault. Accordingly, the above police officers control the Defendant, and the Defendant A attempted to arrest the Defendant as the current offender in the instant assault case. The Defendant A arrested the police officer “I am off, I am off, I am hard to do so.”
“A police officer’s chest part of his chest was taken as head and boomed by booming a police officer’s breath, and boomed by hand, Defendant B her arms of the police officer, Defendant B her shouldered by hand, her hand, her shouldered by hand, and her breast part.
Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by the police officers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Statement made to K in the police statement;
1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of E, F, G, H and I;
1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and the choice of fines) provides that the Defendants shall be subject to the pertinent provision of the law and the choice of punishment against the crime, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act.