Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a D-II truck.

Around 18:50 on September 26, 2013, the Defendant driven the above truck and proceeded one way on the 77th Do road in front of the mountain village in the area of the volcanic village in the area of the city in the eth of the city in the eth of the city in the eth of the city in the eth of the city.

At the time, there is a duty of care to prevent accidents by complying with the speed limit and accurately manipulating steering devices and brakes, since it is a national highway of 60 km at the time of night and where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so at a limited speed exceeding 23.8 km each hour and driven a central line at a speed exceeding 23.8 km on the left side of the said truck and received the rear part of the road left side of the road driven by the victim E (78 years old) who driven on the surface of the road on the side of the mountain village.

On September 26, 2013, the Defendant caused the victim to die with cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebrala from G Hospital located in the Namnam-gunF on September 19:45, 2013 due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Sending a traffic accident analysis report;

1. A death certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the scene of traffic accidents;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the vehicles operated by the defendant are covered by a comprehensive insurance, and the defendant has agreed to do so separately with the bereaved family members of the victim, the defendant has a depth of and reflects his mistake, and various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc. recorded in the records of this case) or more.