(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2020.09.10 2020고합113

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2020.09.10 2020고합113

아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강간등치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant had the intent to have sexual intercourse by inducing the victim B (the name, the age of 15) (the name, the age, the age of 15) that was known through open hosting dialogue to the Defendant’s office.

Around January 7, 2020, the Defendant, while holding a Kakaox, made a false statement as if the Defendant was a male at the same age as the victim, and on the same day, on the same day, agreed to the effect that the victim “the same fluor in Si” was “the same fluor in Si,” and that the victim promised to leave the place of the said promise, but the Defendant did not appear at the place of the said promise.

Accordingly, the victim called the defendant at around 12:46 of the same day, and the defendant called the victim as "a cleaning agent," which means that he was unable to take part in the defendant's house in the taxi expenses," and let the victim go to the defendant's house located in the Seogu-gu Seoul Building D heading around 15:30 of the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant inducedd the victim for the purpose of sexual intercourse.

2. Around 15:30 on January 7, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Rape, etc.) made the victim’s home to answer the victim’s “whether or not there is a male-friendly wind sea,” and “the victim would have taken away” the victim’s chest from the victim’s back to the victim’s hand, “the victim would have taken away from the victim’s chest,” and “the victim would have taken away from the victim’s hand,” and “the victim would have taken away from the victim’s hand,” and “the victim would have taken away from the victim’s hand,” and then, the victim’s son was her knick by inserting another hand from the victim’s back to the date of the victim’s drilling.

Accordingly, the victim's hand knife of the defendant and the defendant about to knife the defendant's hand, and the victim's shoulder that the defendant tried to knife and continue to knife the defendant's arms can not occur in his hand.

참조조문

-청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2016.01.27 2015고합225

-서울중앙지방법원 2012.11.30 2012고합1139

-청주지방법원 2014.01.17 2013고합197

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2013.12.13 2013고합78

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.08.08 2017고합42