The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the court's decision to this case under paragraph (2) of this Article, and therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

2. The Plaintiff asserts that this court’s additional decision in this court’s appeal is against the fact that it stated to the effect that L was a person with a duty of Plaintiff and H in Seoul Southern District Court 2012Gahap102750, which is a civil case, and that the Plaintiff was playing in the instant accident site with H, and that it was against the Plaintiff’s statement to the effect that “The Plaintiff was an employee of B, who is a workplace, as a part of a business trip to attract new customers according to the company’s instruction, and the Plaintiff was on board and suffered an accident.”

The above assertion made by the plaintiff in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court, and the first instance court's decision rejecting the plaintiff's assertion is justified even if both the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the evidence submitted in this court (including A10-16, 16, and 1)

3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim based on the conclusion, is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing plaintiff.