All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as follows, except for adding a judgment to this court as follows, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

2. The Plaintiffs in this Court asserts, as the grounds for appeal, that “The net E, as well as the overworking process, was seriously aggravated due to physical or mental stress due to excessive business instructions issued by the new side of the company (G director), coercion, etc., and the physical and mental stress that cannot be seen on the spot,” which is an existing disease, led to the occurrence of cerebrovascular and the death of the company.”

(1) However, the first instance court’s rejection of the claim on the grounds as cited earlier, even if the evidence examined in the first instance trial and the evidence (Evidence No. 5) submitted to this court were added to the assertion that the “mathathal disease,” which is an existing disease, rapidly aggravated due to excessive work, caused cerebrovascular, is just, and the first instance court’s rejection of such claim is just, and ② as to the assertion that there was an excessive official instructions or unfair coercion by the superior officer, each of the statements in the evidence No. 10, 33, 36-38 are insufficient to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, this part of the claim is difficult to accept.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are without merit.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance that dismissed all the plaintiffs' claims is justifiable, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed without merit, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing plaintiffs.