logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.10.12 2015가합58583
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Plaintiff A Company, Defendant D Company 360,00,000 won, Defendant G, H, I, J, K, and L are each Defendant D Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status of the parties 1) Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”)

Before making the electronic equipment, the electronic design automation (M; hereinafter referred to as “M”) that is designed in advance and that modifies the result by predicting the result through the 2010 Formula.

2) The Plaintiff B (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) is the copyright holder of the program, and the Plaintiff B (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) is the copyright holder of the N(N) program, the third cost electronic recording for the design and interpretation of electronic records of electronic equipment.

3) Plaintiff C (hereinafter “Plaintiff C”)

(4) Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a company that manufactures and sells electronic and wire communications equipment.

Defendant E is the representative director of the Defendant Company, and Defendant F, G, H, I, J, K, and L are researchers of the Defendant Company.

However, Defendant F retired from Defendant J on May 23, 2015, and Defendant J retired from Defendant J on June 1, 2017.

B. The employees of Defendant Company, including Defendant G, H, I, J, K, and L, were excluded from the Defendant who copied only the O program, which is a relatively low-cost program, in light of the Plaintiffs’ individual responsibility for the employees of the Defendant Company. Of the instant program, some of the employees were illegally reproduced by the Defendant Company’s name in the name of the Defendant Company or the Chinese employee after the control of illegal reproduction and did not include the relevant employees in the Defendant. As a result, the difference between the total amount of damages and the amount of individual responsibility owed by the employees.

The plaintiffs' respective computer programs (hereinafter "the program of this case") on the list owned by them are installed in the defendant company's office computer without the plaintiffs' permission.

arrow