1.(a)

Plaintiff

The defendant corporation A and B jointly share 15,510,000 won and the defendant C are above.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) The Plaintiff Oralacro (hereinafter “Plaintiff Oralac”)

(2) AutaCAD 2008, AutaCAD 2009, AutaCAD 2009, and AutaCAD 2010. 2) The copyright holder of the said program was a company that developed and sells an automated design (EDA-Elecronic Demutism), which is a dispute over the outcome predicted through a 2009 program and the design of the electronic device (hereinafter “ADS”), prior to the creation of the electronic device.

Plaintiff

ADS 209 copyright and its claim were acquired from ADS 2009 as a company that was established by division at the above ADS AD 209 around August 1, 2014.

3) Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”).

(2) The Defendant Company’s employees, including the Defendant Company’s employees, have been working for the Defendant Company from 2013 to 2015. (b) The Defendant Company’s employees, including the Defendant Company’s employees, were installed in their own computer without the Plaintiffs’ consent and used the reproduction of each software owned by the Plaintiffs at the Defendant Company’s office. On June 23, 2014, the Defendant Company’s investigative agency’s search and seizure was conducted on the part of June 23, 2014, and the program that copied the Plaintiffs’ software from the said employees’ computer was discovered as follows. The total amount of the fixed amount of the software used by the Plaintiffs on the computers of the said employees (the Plaintiff, Oisoca 208, 2005, 170,000, 1500, 100, 510, 150, 150, 150, 150, 150, 2009.