Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person working in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (ju) D with the fifth floor and who acts for an employer as the supervisor of the supervision at the E hospital extension construction site where D is being subcontracted with the construction supervision part from E hospital by E, and the defendant shall not do violence to an employee for the occurrence of an accident or for any other reason.

Nevertheless, on June 27, 2017, the Defendant pointed out that the Defendant has been on a holiday without reporting it to the Defendant as the victim G (44 years old) who was employed as a subordinate employee at the site office for the extension of the hospital E in 09:00 on June 27, 2017.

“ .....” but the victim “.................

It is necessary to make a report whenever a holiday is used.

6 66 144

For the reason of the answer as "," the picture was shaking the victim's breath with his left hand.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim of a worker, such as salted tensions and tensions that require treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of CD image Acts and subordinate statutes

1. The point of assault by an employee of the relevant legal professional against a crime: Articles 107 and 8 of the Labor Standards Act: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order asserts that although the defendant had flabbbage of the victim, the defendant did not have inflicted any injury.

According to the diagnosis report, CD images, and injury diagnosis report, the Defendant was aware that he duplicating the victim at the time of the instant case, and that the victim was issued a diagnosis certificate at the hospital on the following day.

In light of the above circumstances.