logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.06.28 2017고단2319
집회및시위에관한법률위반
Text

1. The Defendants are not guilty. 2. The summary of the judgment of innocence against the Defendants is published.

Reasons

1. The facts charged in this case

1. Defendant A was indicted on November 4, 2016 by the Secretary General of the Office of Public Officials G association (hereinafter referred to as “G”) working in the Seoul Southern District Court for interference with general traffic by the Head of the F Gu Office’s position and the background of the case, and was currently pending trial. Defendant B is the head of the organization department of Seoul Southern District Court. Defendant C is a Vice-Chairperson, who was detained on November 4, 2016 in the Seoul Southern District Court due to interference with general traffic, and is currently pending trial. Defendant D is the Vice-Chairperson, and Defendant E is the chairman of the G association, and Defendant E is the chairman of the Incheon District Court on August 30, 2016, who was not detained as a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (joint residential intrusion) and is currently pending trial.

On January 26, 2016, the Government passed a resolution on the amendment of the Act of State Public Officials, the main contents of which are the expansion of the performance-based salary system and the withdrawal of low-quality tasks at the State Council. On March 7, 2016, the Personnel Innovation Agency decided on the amendment of the Enforcement Rule of the Decree of the Public Officials Disciplinary Decree, and criticized that G introduced the by-passing public service society retirement system through the preparation of disciplinary guidelines against the passive administration, and G decided to hold a meeting in the form of a press conference before the National Assembly through the meetings of the Standing Committee and the Central Executive Committee. Defendant A, C, Defendant D, and Defendant E participated in the above meetings, and Defendant B prepared the meeting in accordance with the above resolution.

2. No criminal suspect shall hold any outdoor assembly or demonstration at a place within 100 meters from the boundary of the office building of the National Assembly;

Nevertheless, at around 14:00 on March 7, 2016, the Defendants gathered with approximately 30 members of G members in front of the parliamentary Party of the National Assembly of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, as a doctor of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, with approximately 1:30 of G members, and “Issssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssp

arrow