logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.11.08 2017고정72
집회및시위에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant’s Korean Teachers’ Union (hereinafter referred to as “Korean Teachers’ Union”)

As a member of the Association, D is the head of the research planning office, which is an affiliated organization of the former school.

No person shall hold any outdoor assembly or stage any demonstration at a place within 100 meters from the boundary of the National Assembly building.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from September 23, 2015 to September 22, 2015, tried to see the press dog from the front stairs of the headquarters of the National Assembly in front of the headquarters of the National Assembly located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul as the doctor of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, to do so, with 40 members, etc. of the former school and 40 members, etc. of the former school.

E The Ministry of Education participated in an assembly held around 22 minutes by around 14:44 of the same day, such as creating a relief, such as “E regime drop”, “farked educational workers, and workers with three sphere of labor,” and “farbing off the E regime,” and participating in an assembly held by approximately 22 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with other participants in the assembly, participated in the assembly held within the election of the National Assembly, which is the place where the assembly is prohibited.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. On September 23, 200, an illegal assembly (41 files) within the National Assembly (hereinafter “Assembly”) [the assembly subject to guarantee and regulation under the Assembly and Demonstration Act refers to “temporary gathering of a specific or unspecified number of people for the purpose of externally expressing their opinions by forming a common opinion” (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Do1649, Jul. 9, 2009). In other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence as follows: 40 participants, including the Defendant, carried 20 kickets in front of the National Assembly’s death at the National Assembly and carried 20 kickets, and there was a microphone and spacker installed at the site, and the organizer was made using microphones, the Defendant failed to stand against “sponsing” while doing so.

This is, however, a certain number of people.

arrow