(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.01.30 2012고합385

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.01.30 2012고합385

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years;

2. One lids made of disposable injections seized, 40 disposable injections;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 30, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint intimidation) at an Ansan District Court’s Ansan Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 20, 2010.

2. Criminal facts;

A. On May 14, 2012, at around 01:40 on or around 01:0, the Defendant jointly injured the victim’s left her, i.e., “F” in E in light of the following: (a) on the ground that the victim G (the age of 31) smoked tobacco and frighted himself/herself as bad; (b) on the ground that he/she saw that he/she was frighted, he/she was frighted, and that he/she was frighted, and that he/she was frighted, he/she was hicked, and that he/she was frighted, and that he/she was frighted, and that he/she was frighted, and that he/she was injured by salt, etc. requiring light treatment for about three weeks due to his/her loss.

Accordingly, the defendant, together with H, injured the victim.

B. At around 01:40 on May 14, 2012, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven an Ibs car without a driver’s license, and driven a vertical kilometer up to the road front of the “F” restaurant located in the Masan-dong in the Masan-dong in the light-si.

C. At around 02:26, May 14, 2012, the Defendant, who refused to take a alcohol test, made a statement that the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol from the witness, while undergoing an investigation at the J District of the Mine Police Station, and snifting in the Defendant’s entrance, requested the Defendant to take a alcohol test for about 30 minutes on three occasions, but the Defendant refused to comply therewith.

As a result, the Defendant did not comply with a police officer’s demand for a alcohol test even though there is a considerable reason to suspect that he was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

The defendants shall be administered with Mept Amina.

참조조문

-폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2019.03.22 2019고단449

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.12.24 2015고정1498

-춘천지방법원 2016.09.01 2016고단594

-광주지방법원 2014.11.28 2014고단3576