logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.11.01 2017가단250553
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant Republic of Korea among the 496 square meters per 14.21/19 shares per defendant B, defendant C, D, E, F, G, and H, each of which is 14.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The old land cadastre concerning the area of 496 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”), which is currently unregistered land in Incheon-gun L, Incheon-gun L (hereinafter “instant land”), is indicated as the assessment of the instant land on December 30, 1910, but the date of birth and address are not indicated, and the name of the title holder of the circumstance was changed to N on August 1, 1942, and the name of the title holder was changed to N on November 5, 1949.

B. A certified copy of the family register (Evidence A No. 4), and O (hereinafter “O”) stated that the name was restored to O on December 24, 1946, when the permanent domicile was changed from Q Q to Incheon reinforced military R on December 1, 1934, and the new name was changed to N on June 9, 1940.

C. A decedent’sO died on March 20, 1952 and succeeded to the sole inheritance of the Australia, and as S died on January 27, 199, Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K (hereinafter “he heirs, including Defendant B”) jointly inherited, and the inheritance shares are as shown in the attached inheritance share sheet.

around 1949, the decedentO sold the instant land to T, and T donated the instant land to U on May 3, 1973, and U sold the instant land to the Plaintiff around January 17, 1977.

E. From January 17, 1977, the Plaintiff occupied the instant land to the present date and occupied the farmland, and paid the property tax on the instant land.

[Ground of recognition] Other Defendants except the defendant Republic of Korea: there is no dispute over the defendant Republic of Korea under Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act, each entry of Gap's 1 through 32, U's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion-based M and the deceasedO are the same person, and the plaintiff has occupied the land of this case in peace and public performance with its own intent since purchased it around January 17, 197, and 20 years have passed since it occupied it in a peaceful and public performance manner.

arrow