1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 21,362,741 to Plaintiff B; (b) KRW 17,862,741 to Plaintiff C; and (c) from February 12, 2012 to each of the said money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) D means the Defendant’s low-priced vehicle quantity E around 18:20 on February 12, 2012 (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”).

A) A driver had driven and moved two lanes in the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction of the 230-lane, Seo-gu, Incheon. In this case, D, despite the fact that there was an occupational duty to safely operate the front side and the left side and the left side, is negligent in failing to do so and due to the negligence of driving the crosswalk when the green signal of the crosswalk was out of the on-and-off day, but it was impossible to complete the crossing, and even when the red signal was still under way, the accident that the Defendant was faced with the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) A had been under medical treatment due to the instant accident, such as an injury, such as an injury, such as a fluenite fluenite, a fluenite fluor fluor fluor fluor, the right upper fluor fluor fluor fluor, and the right upper fluor fluor fluor, but died on April 4, 2016, during which the instant lawsuit was pending.

3) A (hereinafter “the deceased”) at the time of the instant accident

(4) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle. The Plaintiffs, as lineal descendants, did not have their spouse and did not inherit the deceased’s property.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 10, 13, 17, 18, Eul evidence 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the recognition of liability and the recognition of the above limitation, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the deceased and the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.

However, according to the above grounds for recognition, the deceased began to cross the crosswalk when the signal on a crosswalk is green on and off, and eventually, he was unable to complete crossing until the signal on a crosswalk is changed to red color, and therefore, he was shocked with the defendant's vehicle.