The appeal by the prosecutor is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

(M) Each of the statements made by the victim D, witness E in an investigative agency and the court of original instance shall be deemed to be a traffic accident where the instant accident is an accident on the crosswalk or where the signal was violated.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant on the grounds that there is no proof of crime, and sentenced the dismissal of the prosecution in accordance with Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents on the ground that the vehicle is covered by comprehensive insurance.

Judgment

The court below held that the victim and witness E that the accident of this case occurred due to the shock of the victim who walked along the crosswalk when the defendant's pedestrian signal was green, and that the victim and witness E continued to enter the intersection for 17 seconds after the passage of the signal signal on the intersection of this case on the signal system of the intersection of this case, it would be difficult for the defendant to walk in violation of the signal while disregarding the vehicle on the intersection when the signal of the accident of this case is green or green on-and-off, and it was difficult for other vehicles, other than the defendant, to start along the direction of the first middle school from the Hanburdi when other vehicles continued to enter the intersection, and there was low possibility that many vehicles violated the signal system in the situation of continuing to move along the intersection of this case, and ④ even after the victim's statement was made, they continued to stop in the middle of the accident.