The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the court below rendered against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is contrary to the recognition of the crime, and the damaged articles were returned.

However, the defendant has a number of criminal punishment, including embezzlement and larceny of possession.

There are no new circumstances to consider sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment.

In addition, in full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings until the criminal defendant's age, health, sex, dwelling and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below cannot be deemed unfair because the sentence imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, since it is obvious that the modified name of the crime (section 1 of the judgment below) among the indication of the case in the judgment below is a clerical error in the name of the crime, it is obvious that the modified name of the crime (section 1 of the judgment below) is the