The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the court below sentenced the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is contrary to the recognition of the crime, and some damaged articles were returned.

However, even though the Defendant was sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period, and most of the contents of the crime were used keys to mail box, removed windows, etc., and invaded on residence, thereby thefting precious metals, Nowon-gu, etc., and the character of the crime is bad.

The victims did not agree with the victims, and there are no new circumstances to consider the sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment.

In addition, in full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings until the criminal defendant's age, health, sex, dwelling and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below cannot be deemed unfair because the sentence imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (as to the costs of lawsuit, the proviso of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall apply).