Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants, victims C, and victims D are those who were the believers of the F church in Ansan Dong-dong E.

1. Defendant A’s crime;

A. On May 20, 2016, the Defendant, even though there was no fact that the victims had sexual assaulted to G, who is a member of the said church, at around 08:40 on May 20, 2016, called the said church to H, who is the believers of the said church, and then called the “G gue head.”

B. It is bad gue.

G was sexual assaulted to G.

C, I, J, D, and K were sexual assaulted to G.

C Sicks have become less than one year.

"The honor of victims was damaged by openly pointing out false facts."

B. On May 20, 2016, the Defendant, even though there was no fact that the victim C was sexual assaulted to G, a pastor of the above church, around 19:10 on May 20, 2016, the Defendant, despite of the fact that the victim C had been sexual assaulted to G, a new church of the above church, was bad.

At the bottom of a bridge, the inside of a bridge was made.

The money also 200 million won has been in favor of the debtor.

C also was sexual assaulted to G.

C is now coming now, and it has come up with the same strings.

C is aware of the love of the Gardo test.

C In the words of "the same year for the sick", the reputation of the victim C was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Defendant B committed the crime at around 09:30 on May 20, 2016, in the Defendant’s residence, which was located under the O Apartment P, Andong-si around 09:30, and even though there was no fact that the victims had sexual assaulted to G, a pastor of the above church, the above church, Q and H, ten persons, including Q and H, entered into a sexual intercourse between the above church A, as well as R, and C, D, and J were sexual assaulted to G.

Along with enjoying, we can see.

The promotion of women is accurate.

"The honor of victims was damaged by openly pointing out false facts."

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of C, D, H, and N;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect by some prosecutors against the Defendants

1. Police against Defendant B.