1. Defendant A Co., Ltd.: KRW 70,000 for each of the Plaintiffs listed in the separate list of Plaintiffs listed in the separate list of Plaintiffs as well as on February 1, 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a company engaged in the business of credit inquiry and credit investigation under the Credit Information Use and Protection Act (hereinafter “Credit Information Act”). The Plaintiffs are credit card holders who concluded a contract on the use of credit cards and financial transactions with Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”) and obtained credit cards.

B. A around 2006, Defendant A provided a card accident analysis system development service and customer information, etc., and Defendant A, as a system for detecting abnormal trading or fraudulent use due to the card theft, loss, forgery, etc. (FDS) credit card theft, loss, forgery, etc. (hereinafter “FDS”), made an analysis model based on statistical techniques using large-scale card use information and relevant customer information based on past accident transactions, and took measures such as refusing to approve the card if a credit card transaction becomes discovered at the time of the use of the card.

After its introduction, from December 2013, 2013, C or Defendant B requested FDS business services to C or Defendant B, and D, working for the said companies, was put into the FDS development services of Defendant A and participated in the work by general project managers, etc., and Defendant A provided card customer information to Defendant B without converting (decation) on the ground that it is necessary for the FDS development work. D used the FDS development work while doing so.

C. Around April 2010, Defendant A’s personal information leakage (hereinafter “the first customer information leakage”) around April 2010, Defendant A’s customer information leakage (hereinafter “the first customer information disclosure”) was stored in Defendant A’s head office located in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with approximately KRW 1,023,00 of Defendant A’s members’ customer information stored and used for work.